Exclusive: On Gay Jewish Marriage Announcement in NJ, Leaked Orthodox Rabbis’ Draft StatementThe quite large controversy surrounding the gay marriage announcement in the New Jersey Jewish Standard and subsequent editorial has brought a lot of focus on Teaneck’s Orthodox Jewish rabbinate. They’re now planning to push back. The Jewish Channel has obtained this leaked draft statement from the RCBC, or Rabbinical Council of Bergen County:
RCBC Statement As you may know, The Jewish Standard published an announcement of a forth-coming same-sex marriage in the Simcha section of its September 24 edition. In the following week’s edition, on the editorial page, the paper issued a retraction and an apology of sorts, indicating that they did not accurately anticipate just how disturbed many people in the Orthodox community would be by this announcement, and committing that they would not publish other such announcements in the future. The reaction to this was swift, voluminous and loud, emanating from throughout Bergen County community and way, way beyond, via the print media, radio and television, and, of course, a wide array of internet blogs. The vast majority of comments were negative and highly critical of the newspaper’s apparent change of heart.
To our great consternation, the local Orthodox rabbinate, comprising the RCBC (Rabbinical Council of Bergen County), has become and continues to be the target of much venom presently being spewed, especially on the aforementioned blogs, based on the presumption that the rabbis played a major, and indeed bullying and arm-twisting role in the Jewish Standard’s decision making process. As a result of many erroneous assumptions, unsubstantiated claims and baseless fabrications, the rabbis of our community have been vilified in the most insulting, defamatory and obnoxious of terms.
The following open statement is directed to our congregations in an attempt to accurately present the facts and set the record straight.
In the days following the appearance of this marriage announcement, a number of RCBC rabbis spoke with each other either in person, on the phone or through email. There was never, as suggested in one report, any special rabbinical meeting convened to deal with this matter. The reactions among the rabbis varied. Some stated that they had been approached by numerous congregants who were very upset by what they saw in the paper; others said that only a few in their synagogue seemed to care. Some held that the RCBC should send some kind of response to the newspaper, either orally or in writing; others contended than in as much as this paper does not conform, and does not claim to conform, to Orthodox standards – they do, after all, advertise non-Kosher food establishments and announce communal events which take place on Shabbat – this is not an RCBC problem. In light of the lack of any consensus, and in light of the fact that all this was taking place in the middle of the holiday of Sukkot, when the minds of most rabbis are understandably focused elsewhere, it was decided that any official RCBC reaction would wait until a full discussion could take place at our next regularly scheduled meeting, already planned for the week after Yom Tov.
One single RCBC rabbi, who has been consulted by the Jewish Standard on a number of occasions in the past about issues relating to the religious sensibilities of the Orthodox community, did go, with the approval of the RCBC leadership, though not representing the RCBC, to meet with the executive staff of the Jewish Standard. The meeting was characterized by calm, civility and mutual respect. The rabbi communicated that there were a significant number of Orthodox Jews who felt that the Standard had crossed a line by publishing this wedding announcement, and that if the leaders of the paper are concerned about the opinions of these members of our community, they should reconsider their position on this matter for the future.
- At no time did this rabbi or any other RCBC rabbi express any threat whatsoever, financial or otherwise, to the newspaper.
- At no time did anyone representing the RCBC ever contact any proprietor of a food establishment under RCBC Kashruth supervision regarding anything to do with this matter or with the Jewish Standard.
- At no time did anyone representing the RCBC advocate any kind of boycott of the newspaper or force, urge, encourage, coax or cajole anybody else to do so.Any reports, allegations or accusations implying the contrary are outright lies. They remain outright lies regardless of how loudly they are proclaimed or how often they are repeated.
It is a source of embarrassment to the greater Jewish community that there are various Jewish blog sites, claiming that they accurately report on the Jewish world in general, or cover the Orthodox world in particular, or something of the like, who seem, at least in this case, to have felt no need to display any sense of professionalism, journalistic integrity or even common courtesy. Any one of these values would dictate that all relevant facts should be thoroughly checked and rechecked before launching a nasty verbal attack on others, but that clearly did not happen here. Instead, the sites fed off of one another, built on the uncorroborated posts of others hiding behind the anonymity of a screen name and “protected” themselves by inserting words like “allegedly” and “supposedly” every once in a while. And so the Orthodox rabbis of Bergen County have this past week been labeled thugs, Ayatollahas, Mafiosos, Taliban and who knows what else. All, of course, in the name of tolerance, decency and sensitivity to the feelings of others, and all based on falsehood.
It is our hope that the above will allow our community members to gain greater clarity about what actually transpired here and to avoid being influenced by the many untruths and distortions currently being promulgated.
May Hashem bless us all with the strength and wisdom to serve Him in accordance with His will.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
[...] Now, however, they have emerged with a statement which was leaked by The Jewish Channel (TV). [...]
Pingback by Teaneck Rabbis: Whatever it is, we deny it! | Jewish Daily Report — October 9, 2010 @ 6:03 pm
Tendler shrill and former member of the Lanner cover-up team, Susan (Susie Smear) Rosenbluth made similar claims against the RCBC, see: http://web.archive.org/web/20080803173103/http://www.theawarenesscenter.org/Lanner_Baruch.html
(Excerpts)
Rabbis accused of coverup in sex case
By MITCHEL MADDUX
Bergen Record – Wednesday, July 19, 2000
After interviewing a half-dozen teenage boys in 1989 who said they had been physically abused by a local rabbi, weekly newspaper editor Susan Rosenbluth said she contacted members of the Rabbinical Council of Bergen County, expecting that the Orthodox organization would intervene.
But instead of showing concern about the alleged misdeeds of Rabbi Baruch Lanner, Rosenbluth claimed, three of the council members tried to protect him.
“One called me and said, ‘If this gets into print, we will see to it that no stores under the Rabbinical Council of Bergen County can advertise in your newspaper,’ ” Rosenbluth charged in an interview.
“It was made clear to me by the rabbis who spoke to me that this was an RCBC decision,” she said, declining to name the rabbis. “I said, ‘You’re kidding me. Is this real?’ ”
A spokesman for the Rabbinical Council of Bergen County vehemently rejected Rosenbluth’s charges Tuesday. “We categorically deny that the Rabbinical Council of Bergen County made such threats to Ms. Rosenbluth. We simply do not operate in this fashion,” said Rabbi Shmuel Goldin, a council member and rabbi of the Congregation Ahavath Torah in Englewood.
…
Rosenbluth’s claims, however, represent the first accusations that local religious leaders engaged in an active cover-up.
Goldin declined to comment Tuesday on whether council members had spoken directly with Rosenbluth about Lanner. Rosenbluth ultimately did not publish any article about the accusations against Lanner in 1989.
“There were discussions at the time with various people concerning one specific allegation, and the matter was referred in responsible fashion to the Bet Din,” Goldin said, referring to a Yeshiva University investigative tribunal that heard a dispute involving Lanner in 1989.
…
But in 1989, she said, the issue went beyond ideological differences.
“Kids were being hurt,” said Rosenbluth, 53. “There was inappropriate stuff going on, and it should have been stopped by the rabbis in charge.”
“It was clear that they were not going to allow this story to come out. I think they shortchanged their congregations, and I think they shortchanged our children.”
In addition to offering educational programs, the Rabbinical Council — on which all of the county’s Orthodox pulpit rabbis sit — is responsible for certifying products in Bergen County as kosher.
Because Rosenbluth’s 15,000-circulation newspaper receives roughly 90 percent of its operating revenue from advertising by Bergen County firms selling kosher products, Rosenbluth said she took the alleged threat seriously.
Rosenbluth said she believed the council could have killed her paper by cutting off its principal source of revenue. So she opted not to write the article she was preparing, which she said had been based on interviews with six teenage boys who told her they had been kneed in the groin.
She said she feels guilty about that.
“If there have been children hurt in the past 11 years, you can bring them to my doorstep, because I didn’t print what I should have,” Rosenbluth said.
Rosenbluth said she was also threatened with a loss of business by two high-ranking officers of the Orthodox Union. She declined to identify the two rabbis.
Mandell I. Ganchrow, president of the Orthodox Union, declined Tuesday to comment on Rosenbluth’s accusations.
…
Comment by jewishwhistleblower — October 10, 2010 @ 7:56 am